Sunday, 27 November 2011
Abstractions
Saturday, 26 November 2011
Texture tour
Sunday, 20 November 2011
Critical literature reviews
I found the reading very interesting and informative. I thought there was a clear message and indeed many similarities between the texts, in particular the second section of Poulson and Wallace (2004, p. 25 -36) and the chapter from Wallace and Wray (2011). They present a clear definition as to the function, nature and structure of a successful critical literature review and the pitfalls to avoid.
A key overarching theme that was presented was the importance of the critical nature of literature reviews. We must not be “merely the passive receiver of others’ wisdom, or the over-active promoter of unjustified opinions that leave others unconvinced” (Poulson and Wallace, 2004, p. 6). Being critical will allow us to evaluate others’ views, see the wider picture of research that is out there and our place within it, and present our views from a stance of informed knowledge and understanding rather than unjustified opinion. All of which leads to a greater chance of success.
Another key idea presented was that it is valuable and acceptable to question and critique published works and theories for, as Poulson and Wallace (2004, p. 5) state, “There is a widely held belief among academics working in this tradition that no one can have a monopoly on what is to count as knowledge or on what will work in practice”. It is important to read literature with a questioning mind, looking to the unstated assumptions, values, purposes, ideologies and perspectives that underpin the work and evaluating how these affect the research, the methodology and the conclusions drawn.
In order to structure my own literature reviews in the future, I will endeavour to define a clear focus and specific question around which to work as well as to identify and be aware of the audience to which I will be presenting. At the outset I will outline the scope and limitations of the review and offer stipulative definitions of terms and concepts as appropriate to ensure clarity of consensus.
Texts reviewed will be carefully selected and relevant and I will take care to discern which texts require more in depth analysis and which only a cursory overview. When reviewing I will ensure that I have engaged critically with the texts and interpreted them, offering a synthesis of knowledge from a range of sources, rather than simply offering a regurgitation of knowledge or descriptive account. I will also ensure that the review is balanced and that both the extent and limits of what is known in the field are presented. Any criticism offered will be constructive.
The literature review will be clearly expressed and structured in such a way as to build convincing arguments and draw conclusions relevant to my focus. I will include interim conclusions throughout, which are clearly evidenced from the text, and provide signposting for remaining sections before offering an overall conclusion to the review.
Poulson, L. and Wallace, M., 2004. Critical reading for self-critical writing. In L. Poulson and M. Wallace, eds. 2004. Learning to Read Critically in Teaching and Learning. London: Sage.
Wallace, M. and Wray, A. (2011) Critical Reading and Writing for Postgraduates (2nd ed). London: Sage.
Saturday, 19 November 2011
Texture
More line abstraction experiments!
Thursday, 17 November 2011
View from a Bongo...
Tuesday, 15 November 2011
Line Abstractions
Saturday, 12 November 2011
Line video tour
iPad Creative Blog
My artwork was recently featured by an organisation called iPad Creative on their blog. Follow this link to have a look!
Thursday, 10 November 2011
Music video
Tuesday, 8 November 2011
Daichendt Street Art presentation
I really enjoyed this presentation and found the distinctions between graffiti writing (writing names on walls etc), artistic writing (rather than just letters, colour and shape are important in the letters and the letters take on form), artistic graffiti (where the image is important and combines with artistic writing) and street art (with an emphasis on the image and its context) very helpful. I also found the 5 stages of of aesthetic development described at the end of the presentation very interesting and, as Daichendt (2011) states “age, growth, and development have nothing to do with these progressive ways of seeing and thinking. Only time spent engaging art. Another reason for strong arts programs” (taken from 'Street Art' voicethread comment).
Some applications for my own practice that I have taken out of this are as follows:
Questioning assumptions is something we should embrace - there is no one correct way to view / interpret something or to do things. As Abigail Housen (2011) states: “We have come to believe that discussions of art may be one of the most fertile grounds for teaching critical thinking skills precisely because there is no one right answer.”
We don’t have to exactly follow the curriculum. We should seek alternative methodologies, be creative and tailor the delivery to the students we teach. This will engage pupils, foster creativity and enthusiasm and thus improve output.
Put in support structures for creativity and create an environment that fosters creativity, where ideas are generated, and there is opportunity for the cross fertilisation of ideas - I liked the idea of an open sketchbook where both pupils and teacher could contribute or an open gallery space. This reminded me somewhat of the philosophy behind the Room 13 project. It also gives value to work that is created and legitimises it.
Take risks - don’t be afraid to make a mistake. It is not forever! I think it is important to focus on the process with students rather than the end result - there is often more to learn from failure that success. An interesting point made in the presentation was that the temporary nature of street art is often what draws people back again and again - there is no guarantee it will be there for long and they do not want to miss it. It surprises you.
In summary, street art starts with the object, and is all about the communicatability of objects and an individual’s engagement with them. The Artist teacher starts with the artist - this is a central and integral part of our work as teachers.